'The conflict goes on': South Sudan's never-ending war

Members of South Sudan’s National Army

Members of South Sudan’s National Army during their graduation ceremony on August 30, 2022. Despite assurances to the contrary, and billions spent on peacekeeping, law and order rarely extends beyond the capital Juba. PHOTO | PETER LOUIS GUME | AFP

What you need to know:

  • Conflict still torments the oil-rich but deeply-poor country half a decade after its leaders declared an end to civil.
  • Experts say localised violence has surged.
  • But large-scale combat between Kiir and Machar's forces has subsided since the peace agreement.

Nairobi

"South Sudan remains significantly peaceful", declared the opening line of a government-issued fact sheet for visitors and press as they awaited the historic arrival of Pope Francis in the country this month.

But on his first day in Juba, as the pontiff waved to the faithful, mass graves were being dug just 100 kilometres away for 27 civilians killed in a hail of automatic gunfire.

The deadly episode underscored a sobering reality in South Sudan: despite assurances to the contrary, and billions spent on peacekeeping, law and order rarely extends beyond the capital.

Conflict still torments the oil-rich but deeply-poor country half a decade after its leaders declared an end to the civil war that killed 380,000 people. 

President Salva Kiir and his rival Riek Machar formed a transitional government and committed to uniting their forces into a single army to safeguard their long-suffering people. 

Horrific violence

But this has not happened, and horrific violence continues with impunity. 

Atrocities witnessed during the 2013-2018 war — including sexual enslavement and deliberate starvation — are still taking place, experts say.

"In terms of the violence in the country — we are not seeing improvements," UN rights expert Barney Afako told reporters after visiting South Sudan in February.

"Juba is safer... but we are concerned about what's happening outside of Juba."

Endless war

This month, the UN Mission in South Sudan (Unmiss) warned that armed forces were again mobilising in Upper Nile state, where artillery and rockets have pounded villages in major offensives involving thousands of troops. 

In Jonglei and Greater Pibor, waves of heavily-armed youth have carried off women and children in bloody raids targeting their ethnic opponents in recent months.

Untold numbers of civilians have died in tit-for-tat massacres in other lawless regions.

Tens of thousands have fled to UN bases for protection, compounding what is already Africa's worst refugee crisis.

Camps attacked

Even camps for those escaping the violence have come under attack.

"I think those that suggest the civil war is over are wrong," said Ken Scott, a former UN rights commissioner on South Sudan, and a consultant to Global Rights Compliance, a law firm asking The Hague to investigate high-ranking officials for war crimes.

"The conflict goes on by other means."

Pope Francis lamented the "persistent lack of security" and "unfulfilled" promises of peace during his visit.

"Years of war and conflict seem never to end," he said.

Violence surges

It is not a narrative the government likes to hear.

Kiir told Francis that the presence of Machar as his deputy in Juba was evidence of peace.

Both leaders this month personally assured millions of South Sudanese who fled the war it was safe to return home.

But observers say the government has failed to protect civilians in the past and their soldiers have been directly responsible for violence.

In December, as Upper Nile burned, Kiir said he "cannot stop" the bloodshed. He later walked back the remarks.

Localised violence

Experts say localised violence has surged even as large-scale combat between Kiir and Machar's forces has subsided since the peace agreement.

This conflict is often described as 'intercommunal' -- motivated by ethnic or local grievances detached from national politics.

But experts say the term is misleading, and glosses over the well-documented role of government and military elites in Juba fanning violence for their own political gain.

"Throw a dart at a map of South Sudan and you will find a conflict that has political dynamics or political drivers to it," said one Juba-based researcher who requested anonymity to discuss security matters.

"The peace agreement has brought no end to that, and in that way, the spirit of the war continues."

Pressure

Critics say Unmiss sometimes paints a seemingly contradictory picture of the situation.

In November, the mission said it was "encouraged" by a reported decrease in civilian casualties. 

Two months earlier, it reported that government-backed forces intentionally drowned children, burned people alive, and gang raped a child to death in "extremely violent" attacks in Unity state.

"I find it hard for them to acknowledge in black and white that that was happening, and then say they are proud of a reduction in violence," said the researcher.

Unmiss reported this month that violence rose sharply in late 2022 due to the Upper Nile conflict, and accused state officials of direct involvement.

Unmiss declined to respond to questions sent by AFP.

The mission is among the costliest in the world at $1.2 billion a year, and observers said there is pressure to show results after more than a decade of peacekeeping.

"What fundamentally the international community means when it says that there is peace, it means there is not a war in Juba," said Joshua Craze, a writer and researcher who has worked on South Sudan for a decade.