Twenty years on, the United Nations Security Council has resolved that the 1994 genocide in Rwanda will now be referred to globally as the “Genocide against the Tutsi.”

The decision, made during the Security Council’s session on Thursday, is a major victory for the Rwanda government, which has lobbied aggressively to have the name recognised globally.

The term, which has been in use locally for the past few years, has stirred up controversy, with arguments that other communities were killed too.

But those who defend the new name say people from other communities who were killed fell victim for being against the genocide or trying to protect the Tutsi.

The UN’s legal definition of a genocide (Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)) is: “Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: Killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

The resolution on Rwanda is seen as an opportunity for the country to demand its rights as provided for in the UN Convention on Genocide, which was passed to outlaw actions similar to the Holocaust by Nazi Germany during World War II.

Rwanda is expected to use the resolution not only to seek compensation in the form of a Marshal Plan-like reconstruction of the country but also to put pressure on countries in particular in Europe that remain a safe haven for masterminds of the genocide, who have evaded justice, with some having acquired foreign nationalities, complicating the process of extradition to Rwanda.

On Thursday, Rwanda’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Olivier Nduhungirehe, said on his Twitter account that it was a victory for Rwanda, particularly coming on the 20th anniversary of the genocide.

“It’s worth noting that this resolution is the very first since 1994 to recognise ‘genocide against the Tutsi,’ away from the ‘Rwandan genocide.’ It is unbelievable that 20 years after, we had to argue with world powers about the group that was the victim of the genocide,” he tweeted after the session.

“We fought hard for the past days but I am proud tonight. You may be surprised but our strongest ally in this fight was...” he said in reference to France, which surprisingly supported the resolution.

Rwanda and France have had disagreements on the events that led up to the genocide, with Kigali accusing the government in Paris of abetting the genocide.

READ: France and Rwanda progress on restored diplomatic ties

The discussion on the renaming of the Rwandan genocide, however, was met with resistance, with some countries attempting to block it; but it ended in a compromise with a reference to the “1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, during which Hutu and others were killed.”

“This has been our position and we have always stressed the need for the international community to recognise that the genocide targeted one group of people and it had been planned,” said Jean Pierre Dusingizemungu, the president of Ibuka, the umbrella association of genocide survivors.

ALSO READ: When does ‘international community’ intervene to stop unfolding genocide?