Somalia’s war on Shabaab brings out media's central role in conflict
Tuesday October 25 2022
Somalia’s federal government is quickly realising just how potent an information war with the militant group al-Shabaab is, weeks into the historic battle that has included vigilantes backing national forces.
But that now means the media, central to the correct narrative against violence extremism are being seen as crucial the way they report.
Last week, the Information and Communication Ministry fingered several news websites and one TV channel for spreading al-Shabaab ‘propaganda.’ Some 30 other media outlets were warned but the general ‘ban’ is that journalists should report on the positive results of the national army, avoid endangering the positions of the national forces to the benefit of al-Shabaab and not to re-broadcast Shabaab statements in the media.
Some media lobby players, however, see that as problematic. The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) says that while it supports war on terror, Somalia should not sacrifice freedom of press.
“The media [are] very vital in telling the story of what is happening because the public needs to be informed. That is why we need factual reporting without promoting disinformation and misinformation,” said Omar Faruk Osman, the NUSOJ secretary-general.
“What we need is peace and stability in our country. That is what will create safety for our journalists,” he added.
“The people need to know the truth, and the truth needs to be protected,” he said.
“The media [are] key in providing that protection by conveying factual information to the wider public. Somalia cannot continue to be in a situation that it is now."
Al-Shabaab, a remnant of the defunct Union of Islamic Courts in 2007, have morphed from military combat to targeting civilian sites. Affiliated to terror group al-Qaeda, the militant group also knows the power of the media, or its threat. In the last 15 years, 79 journalists have been killed in Somalia, most of them assassinated by al-Shabaab. Most of them had been warned by the group for ostensibly reporting negatively on its operations in Somalia.
Peace and stability
NUSOJ said journalists need to be encouraged to see the sense for peace and stability, rather than being railroaded to avoid reporting on certain aspects of the country.
Somalia has justified the stance on Article 10 of Somalia’s (provisional) constitution that safeguards “the social stability and integrity”.
Al-Shabaab, however, have hilariously also ‘banned’ the media from reporting on government operations, which means journalists may routinely be targeted for reporting on the national forces’ successes.
“We are hereby warning all the media houses (operating) inside Somalia against joining the war against Sharia (Islamic laws),” read a Shabaab Bayaan (a declaration) last week.
“Any media that intentionally sides with the (Somali) government will be considered as part of the aggression (against us – Al-Shabaab),” it added, insisting that the journalists should be neutral and ‘fair’.
Some other media lobbies including the Somali Media Fraternity comprising of Somalia Mechanism for Safety of Journalists (SMSJ), Somali Journalists Syndicate (SJS), Federation of Somali Journalists (FESOJ) and Somali Media Association (SOMA) have opposed the ban.
Battle on media control not new
But the battle on media control is not new in Somalia, even though journalists are routinely harassed or threatened by operatives from both government and militant groups.
When President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud vowed to wage war on Al-Shabaab back in September, the group’s spokesman Ali Mohamud Raghe alias Ali Dhere retorted within days, daring authorities to go ahead.
In the meantime, the federal government has rejected accusations from rights groups such as Amnesty International that it was harassing the media. Instead, it says it is pursuing national security for everyone.
Mohamed Abdiwahab of Somalia Media Association (SOMA) told the media on Thursday last week that the media fraternity will pay full attention on the development, saying “We shall keep eye on the case.”