Comment
Don't pussyfoot with Bashir, face reality
Posted Monday, September 6 2010 at 15:23
Nobody could quite believe the evidence of their eyes. Was that really Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir? Surely not. Not on this day, our day. And if it was, obviously he would be arrested.
But our eyes were not lying. It was him. Ruining our day. And he was not arrested. He was courteously escorted out of his car and onto the dais.
And President Mwai Kibaki proceeded to rub salt into the wound by recognising him first of all the presidents gathered.
The consternation was palpable among the diplomats, politicians and civil society members present. Ambassadors and high commissioners decided to boycott the state luncheon.
Politicians talked of a citizens’ arrest. Civil society contemplated trying to get court orders for his arrest — but all the judges were at the ceremony.
Statements of protest went out instead. And Bunge la Mwananchi held an impromptu demonstration, urging his arrest — for which two of its members were promptly arrested. So much for the new Constitution and for the promise that it would end impunity.
What really happened? Was an invitation just sent to him as a formality, with nobody really expecting him to attend?
Did he decide, given that he no longer gets out and about that much, to attend at the last minute? Reason says he would not have made that decision lightly without being guaranteed that he would be able to return home.
The post-the-fact explanations from Head of the Civil Service Muthaura, who had led the planning for the promulgation, and Minister of Foreign Affairs Moses Wetangula, implied that, whether or not he had taken everybody by surprise, that guarantee had, in fact, been given.
They were unapologetic. Kenya’s security interests in the region supersede both international and domestic law, they said in effect.
Unbelievable.
Let us be clear on this. Nobody denies that might is right within the international system. But having said that, the global South, including Africa, is engaged in the international system and working towards equity — whether we are talking about seats on the UN Security Council or voting rights in the international financial institutions or whatever.
And, more importantly, we Africans — when all else has failed, domestically and regionally — ourselves call on the international system.
We have helped shape international law — Africa was fully diplomatically engaged in the negotiations of the Rome Statute, in terms of expert input and advocacy by civil society.
The majority of African states are signatories to the Rome Statute — and nobody arm-twisted them into becoming so. Three of the now five situations before the ICC were state referred.
So let us not now act like we are all helpless victims of the international system, without any agency whatsoever. We are not.
-
Africans should have their own home grown solutions. International bodies with mandate from West have chosen to relegate the AU as a nonentity. The war atrocities of Tony Blair and George Bush are none issues before the UN. Muthoni, remember how you tried in vain to get Britain to at least own up about their human rights abuses during the Mau Mau in the 1950? Be wary of the West
-
Ms. Wanyeki let us be clear the AU is a recognized international body to which Kenya and Sudan belong. The so called international community you refer to which is led by white men stood by as Christians were slaughtered in Southern Sudan. It did nothing during the Rwanda genocide and continues to do nothing as Somalia descends into the abyss. Why should we listen to the ICC when the UNSC will not listen to the AU?
.



