News

Don’t break away from Sudan, West tells South

Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
A general view of the ruins of burnt-out Abyei town in Southern Sudan in May 2008. Photo/REUTERS

A general view of the ruins of burnt-out Abyei town in Southern Sudan in May 2008. Photo/REUTERS 

By MICHAEL WAKABI  (email the author)
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel


Posted  Monday, March 22  2010 at  00:00

While it denies any direct interest in the outcome of the referendum, the United States says it is concerned about peace and stability in Southern Sudan and is working with both the SPLM and the NCP to “prepare for the 2011 referendum, and working with the parties to ensure that the process is fair and credible and that the will of the people, as expressed through the referendum, is respected peacefully.” 

Lagging behind

Responding to enquiries by this newspaper, Joann M Lockard, public affairs officer at the US embassy in Kampala, said, “The United States is concerned about peace and stability in South Sudan. The parties in Sudan are behind in the implementation of the most contentious provisions of the CPA, which is why we have worked so hard in 2009 and will double our efforts in 2010 to implement the agreement before it expires in 2011.”

For their part, while officially professing the position of the Intergovernmental Authority on Drought and Development (Igad), which is to encourage the parties in Sudan to make unity as attractive as possible, Kenya and Uganda are pursuing a two-track strategy.

On one track, fearing to set a precedent that could lead to a ripple effect with sections of their own populations agitating for secession, Uganda and Kenya are not officially breaking ranks with proponents of a unified Sudan.

Uganda is still wary of what a split of Sudan would mean for its restive north, while Kenya has for years kept a wary eye on its northeastern regions bordering Somalia.

Share This Story
Share

“In international law, it is very rare to find a country openly calling for the partition of another country because it sets a precedent that could come back to haunt them; in the case of Uganda, you must have heard Norbert Mao (chairman of Gulu District Local Council in northern Uganda) suggest that the north should break away from Uganda,” said Uganda’s Junior Minister for Foreign Affairs, Henry Okello Oryem.

According to independent sources however, Uganda and its EAC partners believe that despite the challenges the South faces, Juba is better off breaking away from its unproductive marriage with Khartoum.

« Previous Page 1 | 2

Add a comment (0 comments so far)

.

IN PICTURES: Congo clashes

In a hand-out photograph released by the African Union-United Nations Information Support Team May 2, 2012 outgoing African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) force commander Major General Fred Mugisha (left) prepares to hand over command to his successor, Ugandan Lt. General Andrew Gutti (right) at a ceremony at the mission's headquarters in the Somali capital, Mogadishu. Mugisha had commanded the AU force since early August 2011. Photo/AFP

AMISOM handover

Malawi's late president Bingu wa Mutharika's supporter wears a "Bingu rest in peace" tee-shirt as he stands in front of the Mpumulo wa Bata Mausoleum during his funeral at his Ndata farm residence in the district of Thyolo, southern Malawi, on April 23, 2012. Photo/AFP/Amos Gumulira

Final send off for Mutharika

Sudanese carry an Armed Forces officer as they gather outside the Defence Ministry in the capital Khartoum on April 20, 2012 to celebrate retaking the oil town of Heglig from South Sudanese forces. Border clashes between Sudan and South Sudan escalated last week with waves of air strikes hitting the South, and Juba seizing the north's Heglig oil hub on April 10.  PHOTO/AFP/ASHRAF SHAZLY

Sudan celebrates retaking Heglig