News

Bush better than Obama on Aids in Africa

Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Obama pledged to increase Pepfar spending by $1b a year, but in his first budget, called for only $165m in new funds

Obama pledged to increase Pepfar spending by $1b a year, but in his first budget, called for only $165m in new funds 

By KEVIN J. KELLEY  (email the author)
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel


Posted  Monday, December 14  2009 at  00:00

In Summary

  • Close to 300,000 Kenyans, 197,000 Tanzanians and 175,000 Ugandans were receiving anti-viral drugs as of September 30.
  • The programme helps support care for 10 million Africans who have contracted Aids.
  • Aids-related death rates in Kenya have dropped by 29 per cent since 2002, while the overall Aids mortality rate for sub-Saharan Africa has fallen 18 per cent since 2004.
  • Over the past five years, an average of 500,000 people with Aids were added to the treatment roster each year
  • By 2014, according to this new plan, about 4 million people worldwide will be receiving anti-viral drugs through Pepfar.
  • The overall Aids mortality rate for sub-Saharan Africa has fallen 18 per cent since 2004

Activists are expressing disappointment with President Barack Obama’s plans for the Aids treatment programme in Africa, charging that he has fallen short of the achievements of his predecessor, George W. Bush.

“President Obama has all but failed to fulfil his commitments to wage an aggressive battle against global Aids,” a coalition of Aids-focused groups declared last week, assigning him a grade of D+ for his performance to date.

Gregg Gonsalves, a leading US anti-Aids campaigner, warned an audience in New York last week, “I am about to say something shocking: I miss George W Bush.”

In many respects, Gonsalves continued, Bush was a terrible president, but “he was exceptional in one. The President’s Emergency Programme for Aids Relief (Pepfar), despite its flaws, saved millions of lives around the world.”

Obama, by contrast, is not providing the resources needed to sustain the rate of growth in the number of HIV-positive Africans who receive ant-viral treatments through Pepfar.

That trend prompted Dr Peter Mugyenyi, director of a Uganda Aids clinic, to express fear that “the carnage of Aids will once again surge and the obvious success we have seen of Pepfar may begin to be reversed.”

Share This Story
Share

Since its inception in 2004, Pepfar has provided anti-viral treatments to nearly 2.5 million people with Aids.

The programme targets 15 poor countries, 12 of them in black Africa.

Kenya ranks as the single-biggest beneficiary of this aspect of Pepfar, with close to 300,000 Kenyans receiving anti-viral drugs as of September 30.

Nigeria has the world’s second-highest number of Pepfar treatment recipients: 286,000. Some 197,000 Tanzanians are getting anti-viral medications through the programme, as are 175,000 Ugandans.

Travellers

The programme also helps support care for 10 million Africans who have contracted Aids.

Aids activists such as Gonzales acknowledge that Pepfar has been enormously beneficial, and they also salute Obama’s decision to end a ban on entry to the United States by HIV-positive travellers.

Due in part to Pepfar, Aids-related death rates in Kenya have dropped by 29 per cent since 2002, while the overall Aids mortality rate for sub-Saharan Africa has fallen 18 per cent since 2004.

A $19 billion US funding commitment for Pepfar over the past five years enabled an average of 500,000 people with Aids to be added to the treatment roster each year.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (3 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by jacquelineakinyi
    Posted December 20, 2009 05:37 AM

    When will we Africans free ourselves from aid dependency?the more aid we refuse the more self dependence which brings more advancement.China is an example which did away with the aid route and are now a self made economic power.Kenyans can do the same.

  2. Submitted by rodgersx
    Posted December 19, 2009 12:47 AM

    i totally agree with this article. Bush was the most Africa friendly president to date be it Aids or free trade. That is a fact. Obama is afraid of talking about africa lest he is viewed as biased.

  3. Submitted by sdale2
    Posted December 17, 2009 11:38 PM

    This is total non-sense. I defend Obama on this one, its his first yr, he has to budget, the US is hurting for your information. Bush was president for stinkin 8yrs and because of his foolishness, Obama has to look bad because he has to fund the project in bits. Read the events happening in the US today and then we'll see who really misses that inconsiderate Bush who messed up the Super Power which has led to what is now being felt in third world nations.

.

IN PICTURES: Egyptians protest military rule

Pope Benedict XVI blesses children at St. Gall Seminary in Ouidah on November 19, 2011. Pope Benedict XVI arrived in Benin on November 18, marking his second visit to Africa in a heartland of voodoo and warning against "unconditional submission" to the laws of the market and finance.    AFP PHOTO /VINCENZO PINTO

IN PICTURES: Pope Benedict XVI in Benin

For the first time in over three years, Somalis venture out to their beaches November 19, 2011showing a new sense of security since the militant group al-Shabaab, aligned with al-Qaeda, retreated from Mogadishu in August. Photo/XINHUA

IN PICTURES: Somalis return to beaches

Somali Prime Minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali, talks to a famine victim at Mogadishu's largest camp on November 19, 2011. Photo/XINHUA

IN PICTURES: Somali PM visits largest IDP camp