News
Bush better than Obama on Aids in Africa
Obama pledged to increase Pepfar spending by $1b a year, but in his first budget, called for only $165m in new funds
Posted Monday, December 14 2009 at 00:00
In Summary
- Close to 300,000 Kenyans, 197,000 Tanzanians and 175,000 Ugandans were receiving anti-viral drugs as of September 30.
- The programme helps support care for 10 million Africans who have contracted Aids.
- Aids-related death rates in Kenya have dropped by 29 per cent since 2002, while the overall Aids mortality rate for sub-Saharan Africa has fallen 18 per cent since 2004.
- Over the past five years, an average of 500,000 people with Aids were added to the treatment roster each year
- By 2014, according to this new plan, about 4 million people worldwide will be receiving anti-viral drugs through Pepfar.
- The overall Aids mortality rate for sub-Saharan Africa has fallen 18 per cent since 2004
Under Obama’s recently announced five-year Pepfar strategy, the average annual rate of growth would slow to 320,000.
By 2014, according to this new plan, about 4 million people worldwide will be receiving anti-viral drugs through Pepfar.
That’s roughly 1 million fewer than would have gained access to the life-extending treatments had the Bush-era growth rate been sustained.
Funding
Leaders of three dozen US medical and public health schools recently urged Obama to accelerate Pepfar and other initiatives until treatment becomes available to everyone who needs it.
The deans and presidents specifically asked Obama to fund global Aids programmes at the level projected in a Bill approved by Congress and signed by Bush.
That legislation calls for the United States to spend $48 billion over the next five years to fight tuberculosis and malaria as well as Aids.
Obama has not yet made a funding commitment for Pepfar in the coming year.
As a candidate for president, he pledged to increase Pepfar spending by $1 billion a year, but in his first budget, Obama called for only $165 million in additional funds.
The treatment trend partly reflects a decision by the Obama administration to devote more funding to diseases other than Aids that kill large numbers of Africans, especially children.
The United States intends to make diarrhoea prevention and treatment more widely available, for example.
Obama’s five-year Pepfar strategy meanwhile envisions a transfer of responsibility for the programme to local administrators in the countries where it is operating.
The White House also plans to focus on preventing transmission of the virus to babies born to women who are HIV-positive.
-
When will we Africans free ourselves from aid dependency?the more aid we refuse the more self dependence which brings more advancement.China is an example which did away with the aid route and are now a self made economic power.Kenyans can do the same.
-
i totally agree with this article. Bush was the most Africa friendly president to date be it Aids or free trade. That is a fact. Obama is afraid of talking about africa lest he is viewed as biased.
-
This is total non-sense. I defend Obama on this one, its his first yr, he has to budget, the US is hurting for your information. Bush was president for stinkin 8yrs and because of his foolishness, Obama has to look bad because he has to fund the project in bits. Read the events happening in the US today and then we'll see who really misses that inconsiderate Bush who messed up the Super Power which has led to what is now being felt in third world nations.
.



